Why Democracy Suffers When a Sitting President Targets Perceived Enemies
Introduction
“When the righteous increase, the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule, the people groan.” (Prov. 29:2)
Democracy thrives when the rule of law is upheld, checks and balances are respected, and the institutions of justice operate independently. However, when a sitting president resorts to threatening individuals he perceives as enemies, the core principles of democracy are put at risk. Such actions not only undermine justice but also endanger the foundation upon which democratic government stands.
The Injustice of Presidential Threats
Presidents wield immense power, and with that power comes a responsibility to act fairly and impartially. When a president threatens to use the machinery of government against perceived adversaries—whether they are political opponents, former officials, or critics—that power is abused. The Department of Justice (DOJ), for example, is meant to be an independent body, not a tool for political retaliation. When the DOJ nears a decision on whether to charge a former FBI Director, such as James Comey, with lying to Congress, the specter of presidential influence looms large, especially if the investigation is perceived as politically motivated rather than based solely on evidence and legal standards.
Dangers to Democracy
Democracy depends on the fair administration of justice and the protection of civil liberties. When a president threatens those he perceives as enemies, it sends a chilling message: dissent may be punished, and the law can be weaponized for personal vendettas. This undermines faith in institutions, discourages whistleblowers, and creates a climate of fear. The danger is not just to individuals, but to the entire democratic system, which relies on the independence of law enforcement and the judiciary.
The Importance of Accountability and Transparency
For democracy to survive and flourish, it is essential that all government actions, especially those involving the prosecution of public figures, are conducted transparently and with accountability. Investigations must be free from political influence, and decisions to charge or not charge must be grounded in law and facts, not personal animosity or political calculation. Otherwise, the line between democracy and authoritarianism blurs, and injustice becomes institutionalized.
Conclusion
A president who threatens perceived enemies undermines justice and poses a serious threat to democracy. Such behavior not only violates the principles of democratic governance but also stands in stark contrast to the moral responsibilities God places on those who lead nations.
The independence of the Department of Justice and other key institutions must be fiercely protected to ensure that justice is served and democracy remains strong. Every citizen—regardless of political affiliation—should insist that government power be exercised with integrity, impartiality, and a commitment to the common good.
As Scripture reminds us: “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” (Proverbs 16:18)
Minister A Francine Green
September 2025
afrancinegreen.com 