Examining the Dangers of Collective Justification for Harmful Actions
Throughout history, the phrase “this is what the people wanted” has echoed through the halls of power, often as a justification for decisions, policies, or actions that result in harm or injustice. On the surface, appealing to the will of the people seems democratic and fair. However, when used carelessly or manipulatively, it becomes a shield that protects wrongdoing and disperses accountability, making everyone complicit in the consequences.
The Power and Peril of Collective Will
Democracy is built on the principle that the will of the majority shapes societal direction. Yet, this principle can be distorted. When leaders, institutions, or even individuals claim that their actions—no matter how questionable—are simply fulfilling the desires of the people, it creates a dangerous moral loophole. Suddenly, injustice, exclusion, or abuse can be rationalized not as personal or institutional failings, but as the inevitable outcome of popular demand.
When “The People” Become a Scapegoat
The idea that “everyone wanted this” can erode personal and collective responsibility. In situations ranging from discriminatory laws to harmful social norms, invoking popular will transforms complex ethical decisions into mere responses to “public demand.” This not only obscures the real sources of injustice but also enables individuals and groups to absolve themselves of guilt. The crowd becomes both judge and executioner, while the individuals within it feel shielded by anonymity and the diffusion of responsibility.
Historical and Modern Examples
History offers countless examples: oppressive regimes have justified censorship, persecution, and violence by claiming to act in accordance with the people’s wishes. In contemporary society, harmful behaviors—such as bullying, exclusion, or even online harassment—are often excused as “what everyone else is doing.” The collective will becomes a mask behind which injustice flourishes.
The Consequences: Everyone Is Guilty
When “this is what the people wanted” is used as an excuse, guilt is no longer the burden of the few who make decisions, but of the many who allowed, supported, or ignored them. The phrase turns complicity into a virtue rather than a vice. It creates an environment where silence or passive agreement is taken as endorsement, and where moral responsibility is diluted until it disappears.
Breaking the Cycle of Excuse
To resist the misuse of popular will as an excuse for injustice, individuals and societies must reclaim accountability. Questioning decisions, challenging harmful norms, and refusing to hide behind the crowd are essential steps. True democracy is not just about majority rule—it is about ensuring that the rights and dignity of all are respected and protected, even when it requires standing against prevailing winds.
Conclusion
The phrase “this is what the people wanted” should not serve as a blanket justification for injustice, harmful behaviors, or unethical actions. Instead, it must prompt deeper reflection: Are we truly acting in the interest of justice, or merely using the crowd to excuse our own faults? When everyone is guilty, no one is innocent. It is up to each of us to speak, act, and demand better—not just for ourselves, but for the society we shape together.
afrancinegreen.com 